Can Quantum Queen Pass Prop Firm Challenges? Full 2026 Backtest (6 Setup Test)
Can Quantum Queen Pass Prop Firm Challenges? Full Test Results
We tested Quantum Queen MT5 version 2.6 and version 3.7 on XAUUSD using multiple risk settings to see which setups can survive prop-firm style drawdown rules.
“`Quick Verdict
“`Yes, Quantum Queen can pass prop firm challenges, but only when the risk setting is controlled properly. Aggressive auto lot settings produced high profit, but the drawdown was too high for most prop firm rules.
Best Safety Result
Quantum Queen 2.6
Risk: 0.01 lot per $5000
Profit: +17%
Max Drawdown: 3.55%
Best 3.7 Prop Firm Setup
Quantum Queen 3.7
Risk: 0.01 lot per $5000
Profit: +19%
Max Drawdown: 4.50%
Recommended prop firm setting: 0.01 lot per $5000. This is the cleanest risk setting from the tests because it reduces drawdown while still allowing the EA to grow the account.
Watch the Full Quantum Queen Prop Firm Test Video
“`This article is based on our full video breakdown, where we compare Queen 2.6 and Queen 3.7 across multiple risk settings. Watch the full video below, then continue reading for the complete written results.
Table of Contents
Why This Test Matters
“`Many traders ask whether Quantum Queen can be used for prop firm challenges. The answer is not simply yes or no. Quantum Queen can generate strong profit on gold, but prop firms are not only looking at profit.
The real test is whether the EA can stay under strict drawdown limits while still producing enough growth to reach the profit target. That is why this article focuses heavily on maximum equity drawdown, not only net profit.
Important: Backtest results do not guarantee live trading results. Prop firm rules vary by company, and spreads, slippage, news volatility and broker conditions can change performance. Always demo test before using any EA on a funded account.
Typical Prop Firm Rules for EA Traders
“`Before testing Quantum Queen, we need to understand the rules most prop firms use. These rules determine whether an EA passes or fails.
The biggest challenge is not making profit. The real challenge is controlling drawdown.

Most Prop Firms Require
- Profit Target: 8% – 10%
- Max Daily Drawdown: 4% – 5%
- Max Overall Drawdown: 8% – 12%
- Consistency: Stable performance matters more than aggressive gains
This means an EA can be highly profitable and still fail a prop challenge if drawdown is too high.
Important takeaway: The real question is not “Can Quantum Queen make profit?” The real question is: Can it stay below prop firm drawdown limits?
How We Tested Quantum Queen
“`To keep this comparison fair, we tested both Quantum Queen 2.6 and Quantum Queen 3.7 using the same backtest period and account size.
Backtest Setup
- Symbol: XAUUSD (Gold)
- Platform: MetaTrader 5
- Initial Deposit: $10,000
- Period: 01 Jan 2026 – 15 Jun 2026
- History Quality: 100%
We tested a total of 6 different setups:
- Quantum Queen 2.6 — Auto Lot + Very Low Risk
- Quantum Queen 2.6 — 0.01 Lot per $4000
- Quantum Queen 2.6 — 0.01 Lot per $5000
- Quantum Queen 3.7 — Auto Lot + Very Low Risk
- Quantum Queen 3.7 — 0.01 Lot per $4000
- Quantum Queen 3.7 — 0.01 Lot per $5000
This gives us a complete view of how aggressive settings compare against safer prop-firm settings.
Quantum Queen Full Test Results Summary
“`Below is the complete summary of all test results.

Quick Summary
- Both aggressive auto lot setups failed
- Queen 2.6 at 0.01 per $4000 passed
- Queen 2.6 at 0.01 per $5000 passed safely
- Queen 3.7 at 0.01 per $4000 was borderline
- Queen 3.7 at 0.01 per $5000 passed
The results clearly show one important pattern: Lower lot size = lower drawdown = higher chance of passing prop firms.
Key Insight
Aggressive settings generated the highest profits, but they also created the highest drawdowns. Safe settings produced lower profits, but significantly improved survival under prop firm rules.
Quantum Queen 2.6 Test Results
“`Quantum Queen 2.6 was tested using three different risk settings. The results show how much the risk setting changes the final outcome.
Test 1 — Queen 2.6 at 0.01 Lot per $4000
This setup produced a strong balance between profit and drawdown. It made $2,679.13, or approximately 26% profit, with a maximum equity drawdown of 5.20%.
This is a good low-risk setup, but the 5.20% drawdown is slightly borderline. It may pass some prop firms, but stricter firms may still reject it depending on their drawdown rules.

Test 1 Key Results
- Version: Quantum Queen 2.6
- Risk Setting: 0.01 lot per $4000
- Net Profit: $2,679.13
- Profit Percentage: 26%
- Profit Factor: 6.27
- Recovery Factor: 4.79
- Win Rate: 85.80%
- Max Equity Drawdown: 5.20%
- Verdict: Good setup, but slightly borderline
Test 2 — Queen 2.6 Auto Lot + Very Low Risk
This was the most aggressive Queen 2.6 setup. It produced the highest profit in the test, but also created the highest drawdown.
The setup made $14,360.11, or approximately 140% profit, but maximum equity drawdown reached 18.79%.
This is the key lesson: a setup can be very profitable and still be unsuitable for prop firms. The 18.79% drawdown is far above most prop firm limits.

Test 2 Key Results
- Version: Quantum Queen 2.6
- Risk Setting: Auto Lot + Very Low Risk
- Net Profit: $14,360.11
- Profit Percentage: 140%
- Profit Factor: 6.76
- Recovery Factor: 5.92
- Win Rate: 85.80%
- Max Equity Drawdown: 18.79%
- Verdict: Fail for prop firms
Test 3 — Queen 2.6 at 0.01 Lot per $5000
This was the safest Queen 2.6 setup in the test. By reducing risk to 0.01 lot per $5000, drawdown dropped significantly.
This setup produced $1,788.34, or approximately 17% profit, with maximum equity drawdown of only 3.55%.
This was the best safety result in the full test. It produced lower profit than the 0.01 per $4000 setup, but the lower drawdown makes it more attractive for strict prop firm conditions.

Test 3 Key Results
- Version: Quantum Queen 2.6
- Risk Setting: 0.01 lot per $5000
- Net Profit: $1,788.34
- Profit Percentage: 17%
- Profit Factor: 6.30
- Recovery Factor: 4.79
- Win Rate: 85.80%
- Max Equity Drawdown: 3.55%
- Verdict: Pass and best safety result
Quantum Queen 3.7 Test Results
“`Quantum Queen 3.7 was also tested with aggressive and conservative settings. Version 3.7 showed stronger profit factor and higher win rate, but it still needed controlled lot sizing to become prop-firm friendly.
Test 4 — Queen 3.7 Auto Lot + Very Low Risk
The aggressive Queen 3.7 setup produced strong profit, but the drawdown was still too high for most prop firms.
This setup generated $6,286.13, or approximately 62% profit, with maximum equity drawdown of 13.21%.
Even though this setup performed well from a profit perspective, the 13.21% drawdown makes it too risky for most prop firm challenge accounts.

Test 4 Key Results
- Version: Quantum Queen 3.7
- Risk Setting: Auto Lot + Very Low Risk
- Net Profit: $6,286.13
- Profit Percentage: 62%
- Profit Factor: 8.52
- Recovery Factor: 3.58
- Win Rate: 89.90%
- Max Equity Drawdown: 13.21%
- Verdict: Fail for prop firms
Test 5 — Queen 3.7 at 0.01 Lot per $4000
Reducing risk to 0.01 lot per $4000 improved the result, but the drawdown was still borderline.
This setup made $2,948.37, or approximately 29% profit, with maximum equity drawdown of 6.42%.
This is a strong result, but it may still fail stricter prop firms because the drawdown is above 6%. It is better than the auto lot setup, but still not the safest option.

Test 5 Key Results
- Version: Quantum Queen 3.7
- Risk Setting: 0.01 lot per $4000
- Net Profit: $2,948.37
- Profit Percentage: 29%
- Profit Factor: 8.91
- Recovery Factor: 3.92
- Win Rate: 89.90%
- Max Equity Drawdown: 6.42%
- Verdict: Borderline / may fail strict prop firms
Test 6 — Queen 3.7 at 0.01 Lot per $5000
This was the best Queen 3.7 setup for prop firm trading. By reducing risk from 0.01 per $4000 to 0.01 per $5000, maximum equity drawdown dropped from 6.42% to 4.50%.
The setup still produced $1,967.50, or approximately 19% profit.
This is the cleanest Quantum Queen 3.7 setup for prop firm conditions in this test. It gives up some profit, but the lower drawdown makes it much more realistic for challenge accounts.

Test 6 Key Results
- Version: Quantum Queen 3.7
- Risk Setting: 0.01 lot per $5000
- Net Profit: $1,967.50
- Profit Percentage: 19%
- Profit Factor: 8.95
- Recovery Factor: 3.92
- Win Rate: 89.90%
- Max Equity Drawdown: 4.50%
- Verdict: Pass and best Queen 3.7 prop firm setup
Final Verdict — Can Quantum Queen Pass Prop Firm Challenges?
After testing 6 different Quantum Queen setups, the answer is clear:
Yes — Quantum Queen can pass prop firm challenges.
But only with proper low-risk settings.
If you use aggressive settings such as Auto Lot + Very Low Risk, both Queen 2.6 and Queen 3.7 failed due to excessive drawdown.
However, once lot sizing was reduced, both versions became significantly safer and capable of passing many prop firm rules.

Version Comparison
Quantum Queen 2.6
- Lower drawdown
- Better capital protection
- Safer for prop firms
- Slightly lower profit potential
Best For Safety
Quantum Queen 3.7
- Higher profit potential
- Better profit factor
- Higher win rate
- More aggressive behavior
Best For Profit
Recommended Prop Firm Settings
- Best Overall: 0.01 lot per $5000
- Safest Setup: Queen 2.6 at 0.01 per $5000
- Best Profit + Safety: Queen 3.7 at 0.01 per $5000
Watch Full Video Breakdown
Where to Buy Quantum Queen
Interested in testing Quantum Queen yourself?
Final Thoughts
The biggest lesson from this test is simple:
Higher profit does NOT always mean better prop firm performance.
In prop firm trading, survival matters more than aggressive profit.
If your goal is to pass challenges consistently, focus on low drawdown, controlled lot sizing, and long-term account survival.




